Archive for January, 2007
MySpace Pictures: The Truth
Jan 26th
I’ve often looked at people’s MySpace profiles and thought to myself… hmmm… I wonder what sort of impression of themselves this person is really trying to portray with this picture. What do they think this picture says about them? Or more to the point, what do they want people to think about them after seeing this picture?
After thinking long and hard about this topic which troubled my little mind to great extents, I realised that what they want people to see, and what people actually see, are often two entirely different things…
I’ve drawn up the following rough guide to help interpret your friend’s MySpace pictures. It took a portion of my cunning. No! All my cunning!
The Thoughtful One
What they want you to think : Deep, emotional, good to talk to, clever.
What it actually comes across as : Boring git, stop being so miserable.
The Poser
What they want you to think : Attractive, thoughtful, cool.
What it actually comes across as : Jackass.
The Rebel
What they want you to think : Plays by no-one else’s rules, hard.
What it actually comes across as : Proof that they have a middle finger. Also a jackass.
The Emo
What they want you to think : Cool, rocker, self harmer, hates life.
What it actually comes across as : HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!111eleventyone4
The Artist
What they want you to think : Thinks outside the box, alternative, artistic.
What it actually comes across as : 10ft tall…
The Legend
What they want you to think : Plain awesome.
What it actually comes across as : Plain awesome.
Thus, the message to take away from this short tutorial, is that either look normal (or at least as normal as you can, i know its hard for some of you…) when you take a photo, or failing that, chew on scientific calculators.
In the Grand Scale of Things…
Jan 23rd
How much do we actually know – in terms of who we are, and where we are? Sure, we know our local area like the back of our hand, we know all the short cuts and things that happen in certain areas. We know most things about the cities we live in, like bus times and what the best club or bar is. Some people, particularly those who travel and get out and about a bit more, know other cities like their own.
But for the most part, I think it’s safe to say, that as we get further away from home or look at things on a larger scale, we generally know less about them. It makes you wonder.
As humans, we are considered to be intelligent beings and at the top of the food chain etc. We have mastered many arts, we invented and discovered many things that, without which, the world would be entirely different today. We know, generally speaking, the way our planet is structured and where it is located within our solar system. We know our solar system is part of a galaxy, and that galaxy is part of a universe.
On a side note, notice I used ‘a universe’ instead of ‘the universe’ – how do we know there is just one? If you really want to confuse yourself sit through this flash presentation about the tenth dimension and await the impending brain implosion…(My brain turned to mush at about the 5th…) With so many unknowns, we are still silently complacent and confident that we know who and where we are.
In the grand scale of things, though, we know nothing. The above referenced flash presentation is just an example of how limited our knowledge is – even though these are all just theories. This short video puts things in perspective from a physical size point of view. It just demonstrates that, in my opinion, we know absoutely nothing about how we fit into it all. There are just too many unanswered questions.
A Few Updates
Jan 22nd
There have been a few changes to the site recently, some small and behind the scenes, and some quite big.
The first major thing to mention is that compatibility with the demon that is IE6 has hopefully been fixed (read about how much I hate this browser here). As a result, however, I have had to use some invalid code to ‘fix’ this ‘problem’ resulting in a no longer standards compliant CSS. Still validates XHTML though, so all is not lost!
Oh, and if anyone knows a better way to implement “word-wrap: break-word” that validates, it would be appreciated!
Other major changes include the trial of a different format forum that integrates a bit better with the whole theme of this site. The old one still exists here but won’t be linked directly from the home page any longer.
The new forum, accessible from the link to your right, is tightly integrated with the whole layout of this site and is still quite simple to use. The addition of the new forum has brought about some changes in the way of registering and user accounts by tying it to the main site.
You do not need to officially register an account to post comments on topics etc within the blog, but if you register to use the forum, you can use the same login details to comment on posts (does that make sense?!) You can log in/view your profile page/logout/register using the links towards the bottom of the menu —>
The smaller changes that I’ve made: inclusion of a post view counter, just for pretty stats really. Shows which posts are popular, and which posts are not so… Also, recently added a “Who’s Online?” feature so you can see how many users are currently browsing the site. Again, see the menu link at the bottom.
And last but not least, the site is now listed in the Technorati database and thanks to me remembering to create search engine friendly page titles (I’m such a jackass), it’s beginning to list quite high in various Google searches.
Thats all for now, move along people, nothing to see here….
G33k?
Jan 14th
The questions you need to ask youself are:
1a) When talking to someone online or in an email, do you use the acronym lol as punctuation? E.g. “I went to work today and stapled my boss’ eyelids shut lol.” Or, “I don’t think so lol it doesn’t look edible” This could apply to any commonly used acronyms, like rofl or lmao etc.
1b) If yes, do you also use variations of the said acronyms to emphasise your point? E.g. your normal sentence might be “I’d hit it lol.” but your emphasised sentence would be “I’d hit it LOL.” Because as everyone knows, putting it in caps means you are actually laughing out loud…
2) Did you read the above and find nothing wrong with the sentence in quotes? If yes, and you weren’t sure about question one, I think you can safely answer yes to that one now.
3) The killer question: Do you use such terms in everyday REAL life? (Yes, I mean offline *shocked!*). Like if someone tells a joke or says something funny, do you say: LOL! or ROFFLE! and then immediately think to youself, “Hmm perhaps that wasn’t the correct reaction…” as everyone looks at you like you’re a complete wierdo…
Answer the questions!
For the record, I answered yes to all three questions LOL!
Rotating Signatures
Jan 13th
Ever wanted a signature for your forum accounts that changed randomly every time the page was loaded? Not sure how to do it? Well read on and be enlightened…
What you need
Well first of all, you need somewhere to host your images. They need to be in the same directory as each other, and you need control over the naming of the files (so somewhere like Imageshack won’t work).
Your host also needs to be running PHP.
Method:
As you know, to place an image in your signature, you use [IMG] [/IMG] tags around the path of the image. Essentially, what you will be doing in this case, is rather than referencing an image file directly, you reference a .php file which calls a random image for your signature. With me so far?
Ok, first, name all your image files you want in your rotation logically (use 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg etc.), then upload them all into the same folder on the server.
Open notepad or any other basic text editor and paste in the following code, courtesy of this site on a single line:
<?php $files = glob('{*.PNG,*.png,*.JPG,*.jpg,*.GIF,*.gif}', GLOB_BRACE); readfile($files[array_rand($files)]); ?>
Save the file as “rotate.php” (remember to change the file extension from .txt to .php), and upload this file to the same directory as your images.
Now alter your signature on the forum as [IMG]http://somehost/sigs/rotate.php[/IMG] you should have a fully functioning rotating signature!
Notes:
Some forums have restrictions on the type of file you can use as a signature image. Sometimes, the .php extension is restricted, which obviously causes problems when using the above method. If this is the case, use the following method: paste the code below into a blank notepad document and save the resulting file as “rand.jpg” :
<?php Header('Cache-Control: no-cache'); Header('Pragma: no-cache'); $dh = opendir("."); while (false !== ($file = readdir($dh))) { if (preg_match('/\.jpg$/i', $file) and $file != "rand.jpg") { $filelist[] = $file; } } srand((double)microtime()*1000000); $picnum = rand(0, sizeof($filelist) - 1); header("Location: " . $filelist[$picnum]); closedir($dh); ?>
Upload this file to the same directory as your signature images. This bit of code basically selects a random jpg image from the bunch you uploaded earlier (similarly to the first method), but since the file itself is technically a jpg (you don’t want it to call itself during the random selection!), there is an exception statement included.
Again, use standard image tags to display your signature:
[IMG]http://somehost/sigs/rand.jpg[/IMG]
And Bob is indeed your Uncle. Any problems, post away.
If Body Parts Had Legs…
Jan 10th
Yes, this is as wierd as it sounds…
I was thinking, how freaking wierd would it be if your limbs could just jump straight off and walk with their own mini legs? The streets would be filled with people chasing after their arms and legs.
What if the body parts were all in a big conspiracy? Like, they’d decide on a time to just abandon you leaving you unable to chase after them. That would be horrible. Torsos just laying in the street shouting abuse at rebel body parts…
But wait, there’s more. What if it didn’t stop at limbs? What if it went on to your head! Or even individual toes?! Or pretty much any body part you can think of! What would be your reaction to a random left breast sprinting through town laughing like a maniac?
The more you think about it, the more it complicates itself. For instance – would the mini legs which are part of your full size body parts also have even smaller legs of their own? And so on…
You see, these are things I actually think about semi-seriously. But perhaps I speak for all of those reading when I say that the non-appearance of further posts about this topic, would be beneficial to all of mankind. Feel free to disagree though.
The Numbers are Crazy!
Jan 8th
Maths is a funny subject. Pretty much everything we use has its roots in maths. Somehow. But strangely enough, the more you think about maths or any specific mathematic theory, the more absurd the whole concept becomes.
Take for instance the question: “Does 0.9 recurring = 1?” Of course not! I hear you cry, because they are both entirely different numbers and no matter how close they are to each other they still can’t be the same. Right…?
Well, consider that the difference between .9 and 1 is .1, and also
from .99 to 1 is .01
from .999 to 1 is .001
from .9999 to 1 is .0001
from .99999 to 1 is .00001
and so on.
Since 0.9r goes on infinitely, we could say that the difference between .99r and 1, for example, is .0r + 1. By logic, this means that the “+1″ is infinitely small in all cases and thus 0.9r = 1.
Another way of thinking about it, is that if you multiply 1/3 by 3 on a calculator (remembering that 1/3 = 0.3r), you don’t get 0.9r, you get 1.
Still following me?
Things get confusing though when you begin to consider further, the reasoning behind the above proof.
If we assume for now that 0.9r = 1 thanks to the method shown above, that means after an infinite number of decimal places, the two numbers (0.9r and 1), which would normally be next to each other on a number line, are in fact equal. Based on this, you are basically saying that all consecutive numbers are equal, and thus implying that when you count from 1 to 10, you might as well be saying any random numbers…hmm…
Still not convinced?
Let x=0.9r (Equation 1)
10x=9.9r (Equation 2)
(2)-(1): 9x=9
Therefore x=1
Need more proof?
1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 => 1/1 => 1
1/3 = 0.3r
2/3 = 0.6r
1/3 + 2/3 = 0.3r + 0.6r
0.3r + 0.6r = 0.9r
0.9r = 1/3 + 2/3 = 1
Crazy Numbers to be continued…
Hmm, That Doesn’t Look Right…
Jan 7th
I’m referring to a large percentage of web pages by the way. Since moving on from Internet Explorer to better browsers (imo), namely Opera and Firefox, it is actually quite disturbing the number of websites (and web pages) that just look wrong. Images misaligned, backgrounds tiled and very poor implementation of content and features. And its not just small sites that suffer from it – there are a few big ones which are no better.
Why? The single answer is Internet Explorer. Internet Explorer was bundled with all Microsoft Operating systems since way back and as such, the majority of computer users use IE to surf the net.
This is all well and good, or would have been had internet standards been adhered to during its development. Microsoft decided to add proprietary features into IE and change the way a lot of established code and features would be implemented into their browser. The end result is that the browser which the majority of people use is full of security holes and renders web content in an entirely different way to everything else.
Consequently, beginner’s websites and even certain well established sites became developed exclusively for IE without a thought for other platforms or browsers, causing quite serious accessibility issues.
To be fair, Microsoft seems to have realised the error of their ways and have begun to make amends upon the release of IE7. It stacks up well with the competition feature-wise and renders most things to web standards. It’s not perfect (no browser is), but it’s definitely a step in the right direction.
That said and done, my ‘inspiration’ for writing this post came after viewing some rather horrendously coded MySpace profiles – not that MySpace is easy to work with in the first place… But just a note for all those with an account – especially those who used a theme generator to create a profile – do yourself a favour and check your page with a different browser or two – your profile may not look like what you were expecting…
The Consequence of Our Actions
Jan 3rd
That breath you just took. Would it have happened at exactly that time and lasted exactly as long as it did if you hadn’t woken up at exactly the time you did this morning? Would the meal you had this afternoon been different had you decided to wear some different shoes – as if they somehow would affect the way you felt as a whole causing you to choose a different sandwich? What if that sandwich you would have chosen had you worn some other shoes was poisoned? Would the shoes you chose instead have been your unknown saviour?
What if everything we did at some point in our lives had an effect on the future in some way, unknown to us in the present? The concept is based on the popular idea that if time travel were physically possible, changing the past in any way would have drastic consequences for the present and future.
If you hold your breath for just a few more seconds, you could delay things in your life by just enough to prevent some awful event occurring. Or maybe those few seconds gained have just inadvertently put you in harms way. Which is it?
The song you hear on the radio or on your MP3 player. What if it was a different song? It would change the way you were feeling no doubt. Would that alter the course of events too?
Of course, the fact that we assume there is a set course of events or a timeline to follow in the first place, is fundamental to this theory – but only when dealing with the unseen future. The initial timeline must be there to lay out any events that were going to happen such that events in the present allow them to be changed.
The question to ask is this:
Does this prove or disprove fate? If our actions in the present do indeed have a bearing on events in the future, this must surely mean that there is an event in the future already ‘placed’ ready to be altered. If so, this both proves and disproves the theory of fate, as firstly, it implies free will – the ability to make decisions and alter our futures. But at the same time, it also suggests that there is a future event to alter in the first instance and thus implies a pre-defined initial path. Fate.
Are you holding your breath?